this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
1012 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

58033 readers
3463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yoz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Omg please get yourself educated. Really scary to know people like you exist.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The post has been put out by the people that made Mastodon. Why should anyone trust you over them when you provide 0 arguments against them.

Embrace Extend Extinguish was always a Microsoft strategy and one they have been forced to abandon over the years. Their attitude changed towards open source because it doesn't work! I think you might be the one who is lacking in knowledge or "education" here.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Open source doesnt work? Would love to see a source on that one alone. Almost sounds like you have an agenda to sell.

[–] furikuri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you misinterpreted what they said. They meant "Their attitude changed towards open source because [Embrace, Extend, Extinguish] doesn't work"

[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's exactly what I meant! Did I fail to write it clearly or is their reading comprehension no good?

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had to read it twice because I misinterpreted it the same way.

Their attitude changed towards open source because it doesn’t work!

That "it" could be interpreted either as 'open source' or 'EEE' from the previous sentence.

[–] furikuri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The sentence itself is a little ambiguous but it's nothing major, it's easy enough to get the message from context

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)