this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
496 points (93.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers
1254 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alternatively, if your current phone doesn't have a headphone jack, do you wish it did?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 126 points 1 year ago (42 children)

Why wouldn't you prefer a headphone jack in your phone? It is yet another option for headphones that worst case you don't use. The only reason it has been removed is because it saves companies a few cents on the cost to build the product.

[โ€“] Alto@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (17 children)

More importantly it removes the expectation to include earbuds with the phone as well as allows them to sell you Bluetooth ones

[โ€“] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is the real reason. The cost savings is negligible. But as soon as Apple got rid of the headphone jack, they introduced the AirPods.

Then Google did it, Samsung did it, and every other phone manufacturer followed suit. They all have their own wireless earbuds.

[โ€“] tea 2 points 1 year ago

I really doubt this is the primary reason. I think it was multifaceted, but really the people in the business of designing phones were already using Bluetooth exclusively and felt that it was good enough. Some designs probably rushed it as a means to sell more premium headsets (Apple, Samsung), other saw it as removing an unnecessary redundant feature that was more prone to breakage and a waterproofing difficulty (Google). I think it really just came down to the personal preferences of the (affluent) people who were doing the designing, not necessarily a purposeful cash grab. It really was not great since wired headphones were way cheaper than their Bluetooth counterparts. Luckily Bluetooth has gotten much better and less expensive. I think there should be options for both.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)