804
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by callmepk@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
  • This is Microsoft.
  • He returns Webhook success with a code 200 and plaintext 1.
  • He returns Webhook failure with a code 200 and a string tells its endpoint returned error 400.
  • the string didn't tell what exactly the error.
  • Don’t be like Microsoft.

EDIT: Got a few details wrong since this happens a few months ago and this meme used to be on r/ProgrammerHumor. Also the proof:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] callmepk@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Now here is the fun part: they do not have a API documentation; they only have a very generic guide on how to setup webhook API

[-] candyman337@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Microsoft code docs are the literal worst

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

Lmao, Microsoft code docs are absolutely amazing compared to the undocumented bullshit I have to deal with at most companies that have rolled their own services.

[-] candyman337@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Right but Microsoft isn't most companies, it's a SOFTWARE company. A multibillion dollar one at that. Compared to other even multimillion dollar companies, their docs are fucking atrocious

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Not my experience at all. What specific docs are you looking at?

Because the .NET documentation and their Azure documentation are some of the best docs I've used and come across. Azure's doc certainly kick the crap out of GCP and AWS.

[-] candyman337@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Their azure documentation is mostly surface level. They make all those docs like they're talking to a user not a dev. They're limited AF when you're actually trying to deploy an app via a ci/cd pipeline

Microsoft365 docks have several articles that are fully depreciated and there is no disclaimer at the top about switching to new security standards or anything like that.

That's just off the top of my head, but there have been plenty more I've had the displeasure of using

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Their azure documentation is mostly surface level. They make all those docs like they’re talking to a user not a dev. They’re limited AF when you’re actually trying to deploy an app via a ci/cd pipeline

Deploy to what? I've had no issues deploying to App Service from both Github actions and Azure pipelines and azure functions / static web apps were even easier.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
804 points (99.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

31217 readers
44 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS