84
submitted 8 months ago by aura@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

signal requires a phone number to sign up. a phone number could be used to trace your signal account back to you. so why do people, especially privacy enthusiasts and experts (like edward snowden), still use it and endorse it when it lacks anonymity in that sense? i get that people could use a voip number or something to sign up, but still.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 8 months ago

With focus on anonymity matrix is better than signal, with focus on privacy signal is probably better, just because you are forced to use encryption.

[-] jabberati@social.anoxinon.de 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Almost all Matrix servers seem to require at least an email address. A better option would be XMPP, as most servers only require a username and a password to register. It's also the IETF internet standard and a lot less bloated than Matrix.

[-] Hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago

I agree with you, but I dont. The bloat is optional and important. Because the bloat is features and people want features.

The thing with the email is a fair point and I wont suggest just hosting your own email or matrix server cuz thats a silly argument.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
84 points (89.6% liked)

Privacy

29831 readers
1182 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS