this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
1922 points (99.7% liked)

Fediverse

27729 readers
273 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Edit: Also the middle class make up half or more of the working population according to some definitions. You’re saying that more than half workers shouldn’t be part of the socialist movement. Think about that before you answer.

Liberal definitions.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)
[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

With the marxist definitions. Class is determined by your relationship to the mode of production, they are extremely specific because that is literally a requirement of doing anything scientific with them. A simple explanation is here: https://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/wiki/class/

I personally wrote the first iteration of that page when I was a moderator there.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then why are you trying to call out "champagne socialists"? There are parts of the working class that have more than enough money to buy champagne and generally live a comfortable (or even affluent) lifestyle. There are even people who have made millions through labor alone, more rich than the petty-burgeoise. You've talked yourself into a contradiction.

I've also literally made the arguement that you are now making about working class not being how much you earn. I had to do this when someone tried to claim that programmers and police officers are not working class cause they earn too much. The difference is I don't go around accusing people who work full time of being "champagne socialists" whatever that term means.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I called you a champagne socialist for being obviously full of shit, spending your time doing anti-communism with this "tankie" bollocks instead of actually trying to make the world better in any meaningful way. Not because some workers are high earners.

All this shit does is amount to actively punching left. All punching left does is move the political dial rightwards.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mate your from a regime that failed every single time it was tried. You're existence makes the whole cause look bad and is why the left has recruiting problems.

The best thing I could possibly do for socialism is get rid of Stalinists and Maoists. These leaders were about as bad as Churchil. There are plenty of anarchists that want rid of you too, who I am still considering joining. The anarchists were the ones that invented the term tankie to begin with!

Nobody will take the far-left seriously until we come up with something that isn't Marxist-Leninism. Even Trotskists have some clue about this problem, and Trotsky was more radical than Stalin by some accounts.

Honestly I don't know why I bother. As you have pointed out my parents are petty-burgeoise. I could probably become a petty-burgeoise or at least a high earning member of the proletariat if I put my mind to it. I have more chance of that happening than you guys actually causing a revolution and not have it collapse afterwards. I mean I already have a Master's degree, it's really not that difficult to move up in the world provided your not starving to begin with and you're not an idiot.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are demonstrating precisely why we say that class determines politics rather than anything else. You lean decidedly right, not left. Because of your class background.

I'm quite bored with this conversation. You will grow into a libdem or a tory. It is a waste of my time.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's rich coming from someone who will likely kill other communists if a revolution is successful. That's what MLs always do. Time and time again.

Also Lenin was born upper middle class. So clearly what you are saying is false if you actually follow Lenin.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. If you have to resort to that it shows you lost. How old even are you to be telling me to grow up? You're edgy enough still to support a dictators that killed real leftists. That's why everyone calls you tankies. You can't deal with the fact that your leaders come from middle class backgrounds either.

I've actually had enough of this now. Thanks for reminding me why people hate tankies.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm close to twice your age. When you've actually joined a union, grown up and realised real life isn't like this terminally online shit hit me up again.

[–] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't even know my age. I could be older than you for all you know.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I am reporting what I have seen amoung students rather than the general population.

Gives me plenty.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)