266

Log bridge for a train, Oregon, USA, 1905 (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/historyporn@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Any engineers happen to know (I'm curious) how stable a design like this is?

[-] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 29 points 7 months ago

This is Crib trestle bridge of the Columbia & Nehalem Valley Railroad at the McBride Creek, circa 1905. A source: https://www.vintag.es/2017/10/vintage-photographs-of-incredible.html

Which says:

Early timber bridges had their drawbacks. Untreated lumber only lasted about 20 years and locomotives could easily cause the wood to catch fire. Collapses - rare today - were a regular occurrence on logging railroads and there are numerous accounts of train crews that regularly hopped off their slow moving locomotive as it approached a high, untrustworthy trestle, allowing it to cross before they would then run across the bridge and jump back on.

But that's about log bridges generally, not this one. Here's an unhelpful wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crib_bridge

[-] rustyredox@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

So, you're telling me that conductors would ghost ride their own train as a safety precaution? What a wild time!

I can only imagine the instances where the track dipped downhill a little after a bridge, picking up unsuspected speed, and leaving the crew frantically sprinting after the caboose.

Or that one bad day, when it's late into your shift, and you're feeling kind of sick and tired, and just don't have it in you to jog after your train over the upteinth bridge tonight, so you decide to risk it, relax a little, and ride it out. But then your luck also runs out, and you fall down the ravine in a burning metal cage only to then drown in the river, like some big budget action shot in a 1926 silent-film.