Homelab

371 readers

9 users here now

Rules

Be Civil.
Post about your homelab, discussion of your homelab, questions you may have, or general discussion about transition your skill from the homelab to the workplace.
No memes or potato images.
We love detailed homelab builds, especially network diagrams!
Report any posts that you feel should be brought to our attention.
Please no shitposting or blogspam.
No Referral Linking.
Keep piracy discussion off of this community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

rglullis@communick.news

Overkill for starter build? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by PastamanVibrationsYa@alien.top to c/homelab@selfhosted.forum

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Will this be overkill or otherwise not recommended for someone who is new and just starting to learn?

My goal is to have something I can grow into, but initially I'd like to host a few VMs, game servers, and a have place to store content. I'd also like to host a PLEX server in the future as well but might buy a separate piece of hardware for it specifically down the road. Thanks in advance for taking the time to help a newbie!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dfir_as@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

A 12/13 generation NUC with 64GB RAM eats most of those very outdated servers alive.

And storage you can easily put into a NAS with SFP+ slots.

pro argument for 10+ year racks are:

if you have free energy
heating included
direct attached storage for performance tasks (you can get around that easily with multiple NVMe - not in a NUC though)
looks professional

[–] dangernoodle01@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you link a $400 NUC (with 64GB RAM) that eats this server alive? (With also CPU benchmarks?)

[–] dfir_as@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Running costs are a thing unless you have free energy as posted before or mama pays for it.

[–] dangernoodle01@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

So you can't?

load more comments (2 replies)