this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
105 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5105 readers
488 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chup@feddit.de 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

This reads like an onion article. How did they not have to detect and fix their self-inflicted methane leaks so far?

[...]for the first time, require oil and gas producers to detect and fix leaks of methane.

It was the most ambitious move to reduce fossil fuel emissions that President Biden’s administration was expected to unveil at the summit,[...]

This is the most ambitious move? While extracting natural gas, they create methane leaks. So far they were ignored? And now someone had the ambitious idea to no longer ignore them? How is this reality and not satire?

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It turns out if you don't regulate something, and it costs significant money to fix, even if it is known to be harmful to people, the environment, and is potentially explosive, companies will choose to keep money vs spending money to fix the problem.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even with regulation a company will avoid fixing the problem if paying the penalty is cheaper. Bonus points if they're allowed to pass the cost on to the consumers. Right, Duke Energy?

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Right, and Dominion tries to slink away unnoticed.

Reminder that Post McCrory know about and conspired with Duke Energy to poison drinking water people paid for.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Problem is, it was being regulated. We have Trump to thank for that ending.

load more comments (4 replies)