this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
39 points (82.0% liked)

Litterbox Comics

147 readers
1 users here now

Let’s talk about Litterbox Comics!

https://www.litterboxcomics.com/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (5 children)

wouldn’t it be six?

She has two wolves plus two baby wolves

Each baby wolf would also have two wolves.

[–] Ediacarium@feddit.de 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So 8? Her two inner wolves, the two baby wolves and their two wolves. 2+2+2*2=8

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Actually yes, I missed two somehow

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

You also missed the other infinitely many

[–] Fades@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Huh??? No it isn’t 8, the fuck?

She has two babies, that is three wolves each made up of two wolves inside them: 3*2 or 2+2+2

In your equation, you say 2 (mom) + 2(kid1) + 2(kid2) which has already taken care of the number of wolves (as each has two inside them) — but then you multiply this summation by two, why?

I guess you’re splitting it uo differently but it still doesn’t make sense: you’re saying 2 (mom’s wolves) + 2 (kids) + (2 kids wolves) which covers everything because for each kid there is another wolf which you include in the 3rd 2 of your equation, but then you multiply it by two for some reason.

Even if you were counting the host body as yet another wolf that brings it to 9 not 8.

[–] boeman@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Plus the 2 kids are both wolves and inside her.

load more comments (2 replies)