this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
103 points (95.6% liked)

KDE

4682 readers
53 users here now

KDE is an international technology team creating user-friendly free and open source software for desktop and portable computing. KDE’s software runs on GNU/Linux, BSD and other operating systems, including Windows.

Plasma 6 Bugs

If you encounter a bug, proceed to https://bugs.kde.org, check whether it has been reported.

If it hasn't, report it yourself.

PLEASE THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE POSTING HERE.

Developers do not look for reports on social media, so they will not see it and all it does is clutter up the feed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

For me, yes: Wayland doesn't work at all and the only answer I can get is that it's because of Nvidia. That's stupid because until some update broke it, it worked. Most apps were just very buggy.

[–] stevecrox@mastodonapp.uk 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

@Fleppensteijn @leopold its a Nvidia issue.

For years Nvidia tried pushing an alternative Linux driver called EGL, everyone told them it couldn't support Wayland

Eventually Nvidia tried to implement EGL backends to Gnome and KDE (this resulted in the buggy apps). Nvidia then declared their new cards would support GBM.

This leaves the 10xx-30xx cards stuck on EGL with no one supporting the EGL backends. Nvidia have made it so GBM support can't be added by outsiders to those cards either.

[–] theHamsta@mastodon.social 1 points 6 months ago

@Fleppensteijn @leopold @stevecrox

All of Wayland is based on EGL. What you are referring to are EGLStreams vs GBM which are both libraries using EGL. Nvidia drivers now support GBM for all supported GPUs via a support library that comes with the driver (libnvidia-egl-gbm https://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/510.39.01/README/gbm.html). There should be no difference in the GPU generation used.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)