this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
622 points (100.0% liked)

196

16276 readers
17 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago (9 children)

One time I was bored translated this formula to work on a TI-83 calculator

The original does work or course but it doesn't look right since the TI-83 isn't as precise as something like Desmos. You have to change the numbers around a bit to make it look right

[–] yimby@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

It's the last equation j(x) that's wrong. What's plotted on the right is something like 0.2x+1.6

Your graphing calculator is more than capable of plotting linear functions just as well as desmos.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I wasn't following the image, I was following Desmos's official formula.

The equation works, but since you can't zoom in on TI-83 (or at least I'm not aware you can) you have to scale up the formula to make the symbol appear properly.

[–] mkwarman@lemmy.mkwarman.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can zoom on the TI-83/TI-84 by either using the zoom functions or by setting the desired viewport size

Here's a video of someone doing it: https://youtu.be/tEkdCEhSZrY?si=ejhNefLX0qmOUofu

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/tEkdCEhSZrY?si=ejhNefLX0qmOUofu

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)