this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1104 points (97.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20846 readers
2273 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1104
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Zeon@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cosmocrat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 8 months ago (16 children)

I can't remember where I read this but I saw somewhere that open firmware is forbidden in things like cellular modems because it might be abused to disrupt communications. I think that's bullshite, though.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (10 children)

How would open source software be used to disrupt communications? What am I not understanding here?

[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In additional to the other comment, I think there's also a traditional fear of corruption in open source. If the code is public then malicious parties are free to read and take advantage of holes in the security. Secondly it would be possible to contribute code with secret functionality that goes unnoticed. These are fairly easily debunked but seem to remain in people's heads.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago

Ugh I hate these arguments about giving bad actors easier access. Bad actors are going to figure out flaws and security holes whether it's open source or not. Security through obfuscation is a temporary measure and having more eyes on the source means more chances for good actors to find flaws and publicize them for fixes.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)