this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
251 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
251
A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI (www.vox.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI::A list of authors and entertainers are also suing the tech company for damages that could total in the billions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 68 points 9 months ago (35 children)

I always say this when this comes up because I really believe it's the right solution - any generative AI built with unlicensed and/or public works should then be free for the public to use.

If they want to charge for access that's fine but they should have to go about securing legal rights first. If that's impossible, they should worry about profits some other way like maybe add-ons such as internet connected AI and so forth.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also anything produced with solar power should be free.

[–] Prok@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yes, good point, resource collection is nearly identical to content generation

load more comments (33 replies)