276
submitted 11 months ago by const_void@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Since Twitter was bought by the world's biggest manbaby I've been using Nitter to avoid giving them any traffic/analytics/etc.

Full list of Nitter instances here: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wheeljack@nerdbin.social 67 points 11 months ago

I don't really grok products like this.

If you have a fundamental disagreement with a platform, continuing to engage with it, even through a condom, is still perpetuating it. It's maintaining that platform as still important and integral, and a place that others should continue to engage with. It's telling advertisers that it's still a place that's worth their money to maintain a presence on. It stymies the momentum in shifting to an alternative; why put the effort into a new service if people are still seeing your posts?

It's like pirating Windows instead of moving to a different OS. You're still perpetuating the MS hegemony and telling software developers that Windows is the platform they need to develop for.

[-] jjdelc@lemmy.ml 68 points 11 months ago

The analogy of simply choosing different software doesn't apply here. Because I can switch my os or calculator app. Those choices don't depend on other people. Sadly, we still depend on being able to read content that other parties we care for still publish on Twitter even though I disagree with it as a to. Maybe they do or dont care. I can disagree with Twitter and like my influencers. For that, something like nitter is a good step in the direction. I want to move. As muchas I'd like to snap my fingers and have everyone into my network of personal choice. It cannot happen.

[-] Mynameisnotdoug@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Sure it does. They will stop posting to twitter when people stop reading it.

[-] atwerp@feddit.nl 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sadly, we still depend on being able to read content that other parties we care for still publish on Twitter even though I disagree with it as a to. Maybe they do or dont care. I can disagree with Twitter and like my influencers.

As somebody who still has to check Reddit from time to time because of the vast amount of content there, I totally see your point. But don't influencers nowadays use everything possible? If you don't like Instagram, follow them on Tiktok/Youtube, if you don't like Twitter, follow them on Threads.

[-] tshannon@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

I'm sure influencers do, but over half the xevelopersyi like to follow on Twitter all created Mastodon accounts but never post to them. They all still only post to Twitter.

[-] jjdelc@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I used influencers as an example, that's true that they're everywhere. But there's many communities I follow that don't care about Twitter politics, and they got little interest or even information to consider moving elsewhere.

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
276 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

33638 readers
213 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS