[…] being able to say, "wherever you get your podcasts" is a radical statement. Because what it represents is the triumph of exactly the kind of technology that's supposed to be impossible: open, empowering tech that's not owned by any one company, that can't be controlled by any one company, and that allows people to have ownership over their work and their relationship with their audience.

What podcasting holds in the promise of its open format is the proof that an open web can still thrive and be relevant, that it can inspire new systems that are similarly open to take root and grow.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago (18 children)

Could someone explain to me (I'm a developer so use whatever terms you like, maybe), how does the massive amount of podcasts reach the world? Say if I wanted to make a podcast app (I don't, I love Pocket Casts), where would I sync the massive list'o'casts? Does it work like that? Or do you scrape the entire internet? What is happening?

[–] yogurt@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (7 children)

iTunes api, and if apple turns evil there are other list-o-cast apis like fyyd.de.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)

if apple turns evil

Lolol yeah like that could EVER happen! /s

[–] yogurt@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Compared to Reddit or Twitter anyway, they haven't killed their API yet so apps like pocket casts are mainly using iTunes for search

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Ah-ha. Interesting. Thanks!

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Are you sure about this? I was under the impression there were several aggregators out there who all sort of shared data, iTunes just being one of them. Maybe you are totally right, but if you are that sort of undermines the original post, which is saying that the podcast ecosystem doesn't depend on any one company/org.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (13 replies)