sh.itjust.works Main Community

7718 readers

3 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

114

FYI sort by "Top Day" if you're tired of seeing the same top posts from 2-3 days ago (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MonkCanatella@lemmy.world to c/main@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/192630

I've been noticing myself that sorting by active or hot just gives me days old posts, so I've been sorting by new but it's not a great experience. this should be a pretty good middle ground.

Not sure what's happening with the ranking algorithm, but it seems like the default main page is still displaying the same set of popular posts from a few days ago.

But if you switch to sorting by "Top Day," it'll show fresh popular posts from the past day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've been going to new, and then going to the second page to avoid post bursts. I just refresh when I want new stuff. It's worked pretty well for me so far. Hopefully 0.18 is out soon and fixes the bursting and hot/active algorithm issues

[–] bayesianbot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks, I thought I was doing something wrong but I guess this is a common issue then. Bad timing to have such a weird user experience just when we're having an influx of new users, who will surely get frustrated.

[–] nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wasn't around then, but apparently the functionality that led to bursting was added when Lemmy was much smaller, so it would just update with 1 or 2 new posts at a time since there were so few. When it ballooned it pretty much broke that unfortunately.

[–] 9999monkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

that makes sense

load more comments (1 replies)