Python

6356 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

Past

November 2023

PyCon Ireland 2023, 11-12th
PyData Tel Aviv 2023 14th

October 2023

PyConES Canarias 2023, 6-8th
DjangoCon US 2023, 16-20th (!django 💬)

July 2023

PyDelhi Meetup, 2nd
PyCon Israel, 4-5th
DFW Pythoneers, 6th
Django Girls Abraka, 6-7th
SciPy 2023 10-16th, Austin
IndyPy, 11th
Leipzig Python User Group, 11th
Austin Python, 12th
EuroPython 2023, 17-23rd
Austin Python: Evening of Coding, 18th
PyHEP.dev 2023 - "Python in HEP" Developer's Workshop, 25th

August 2023

PyLadies Dublin, 15th
EuroSciPy 2023, 14-18th

September 2023

PyData Amsterdam, 14-16th
PyCon UK, 22nd - 25th

🐍 Python project:

💓 Python Community:

#python IRC for general questions
#python-dev IRC for CPython developers
PySlackers Slack channel
Python Discord server
Python Weekly newsletters
Mailing lists
Forum

✨ Python Ecosystem:

🌌 Fediverse

Communities

#python on Mastodon
c/django on programming.dev
c/pythorhead on lemmy.dbzer0.com

Projects

Pythörhead: a Python library for interacting with Lemmy
Plemmy: a Python package for accessing the Lemmy API
pylemmy pylemmy enables simple access to Lemmy's API with Python
mastodon.py, a Python wrapper for the Mastodon API

Feeds

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

erlingur@programming.dev

jnovinger@programming.dev

norambna@programming.dev

149

PySimpleGUI is now closed-source (github.com)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by ebits21@lemmy.ca to c/python@programming.dev

78 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Vast_Emptiness@programming.dev -19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Bruh. This is why I hate all the open source license that are not GPL. Are not free software. I am not bother to pay for it. But I am bother to not see the code :(

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Only to a certain extent.

The problem is that a lot of software is very complex and requires full-time development/maintenance. It's simply not possible to work on stuff for free unless this is just a hobby and you can sustain yourself with a main job.

The main thing I have a problem with this instance is the following sequence of events

The developer licensed it as LGPL.
They did not accept ANY contributions to the code.
The project became popular enough for people to post about in the fediverse (quite popular then, I guess)
They got donations for their work, but apparently it was not enough.
They removed the project from being accessible and moved to a paid only model.

This tells me:

Their intention all along was to abuse FOSS community for popularity, traction, clout and free testing by people who are also doing this stuff in their free time.
They got donations, but for whatever reason it was not enough for them. => Were they expecting to make retirement level income from their project which is in a crowded segment?

[–] Vast_Emptiness@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah if you really care about FOSS you should use GPL and not MIT BDS and a multiple license. Because at the end of the day the code can became close source in just a second. That is the point of GPL and the Foss. I am willing to pay with money because I can. But I am not willing to pay with trust.

[–] thtroyer@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

What? The GPL would have offered no more protection for this exact scenario than the LGPL (or any other license for that matter).