this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
241 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

59680 readers
3292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
241
Best Buy Geek Squad Agents ‘Going Sleeper’ After Mass Layoffs (www.404media.co)
submitted 7 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 184 points 7 months ago (18 children)

Heads up, the headline is kind of misleading. “Going sleeper” is just their internal slang for getting laid off. It doesn’t mean some kind of protest or activism.

[–] exanime 86 points 7 months ago (14 children)

The headline is stupid ... It basically says Geek Squad is laid off after getting laid off

Journalism is basically beyond saving at this point...

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

Journalism is basically beyond saving at this point...

I mean, it's basically a no name website. It's not like this is a NYTimes, AP, or The Atlantic headline.

Edit: I guess what I'm really asking is, it's a bad headline from a small publisher (it's surely happened many many times for decades), can't we leave it at that without the dramatization?

[–] exanime -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess what I'm really asking is, it's a bad headline from a small publisher (it's surely happened many many times for decades), can't we leave it at that without the dramatization?

If this were an isolated example, sure.... But go to all those sources you mentioned and tell me how many times some "slammed" someone else...

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But go to all those sources you mentioned and tell me how many times some “slammed” someone else

Okay ... Let's google it ... I'm open to be being bias checked; The Atlantic and NY Times.

Some "The Atlantic" examples:

  • "Boston Fire Chief Slammed Over His Response to Marathon Bombing"
  • "Northeast Slammed by Blizzard"
  • "The Storm Heard Round the World: How Sandy Slammed Global Aviation"
  • "This is What 400 Pounds of Sumo Wrestler Getting Body-Slammed Looks Like"
  • "HuffPo's Sex Strategy Slammed"
  • "Republicans Slammed for Recruiting 'Hicky' Actors for West Virginia Ad"
  • "Everyone's Getting 'Slammed' This Week"

Some "NYTimes" examples:

  • "A Window Into Chinese Government Has Now Slammed Shut"
  • "Trump Slammed the W.H.O. Over Coronavirus. He’s Not Alone."
  • "Regional Banks Slammed by Fear of a Broader Financial Crisis"
  • "How Mink, Like Humans, Were Slammed by the Coronavirus"

What's your point exactly? These aren't (IMO) atrocious headlines; I suppose a few could be more informative for sure but also these are like ~1 per year.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)