this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
68 points (98.6% liked)

Be sure to read the rule before you leave

1083 readers
1 users here now

Rule 3: If you visit MoreTankie196, you are contractually obliged to post before you leave

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Finiteacorn@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 4 months ago (5 children)

potential future lives arent lives, run over the guys balls this isnt even a dilemma.

[–] zorblitz@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They're not potential lives, they're guaranteed because the trolley can see the future

[–] Finiteacorn@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

it doesnt matter they dont exists the other people do, killing people isnt bad because there are less people around its bad cuz u fucking killed someone, maximizing the number of people on earth isnt some moral imperative.

also they are potential, if i crush the guys balls they wont exist so the trolley can at best see potential futures.

[–] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 months ago

If the trolley is basically laplaces demon, then the only outcome that will happen is killing 500.

[–] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 months ago

If those lives will definitely exist then the choice that will be made regardless of the morality will be killing 500. Anyway, who decided more people in the world is a moral good? In my culturally constructed opinion, what matters is people that currently live, not whether or not people exist in the future (I would say the quality of people’s lives in the future might matter though).

load more comments (2 replies)