this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2233 readers
23 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 11 points 4 months ago (7 children)

As expected, the article doesn't even mention China's own extremely restrictive tariffs, including those on foreign-made cars.

[–] InevitableList@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would it? Reason has never targeted a Chinese audience.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because context matters. In the same vein, the hidden and thereby illegal state subsidies Chinese electric car makers are receiving should also be mentioned. Biden's tariffs aren't happening in a vacuum.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Illegal state subsidies?" From whom?

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'll let you figure out where Chinese car makers are getting their subsidies from.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I think their point is legality is relative ... surely what China is doing is legal in China. "Unreasonable" would be a better term than illegal.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

It's not relative. The moment a Chinese good is being sold outside of China, it has to follow local laws, which includes laws against market manipulation. Chinese manufacturers and sellers have been ignoring them for a long time, but there is finally some pushback.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

Got it in one.

load more comments (5 replies)