this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
108 points (99.1% liked)

Linux Gaming

15221 readers
109 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
monolalia@lemmy.world
108
Vulkan or DirectX on Linux? (slrpnk.net)
submitted 4 months ago by Sunny@slrpnk.net to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I use an AMD card, playing on Bazzite. How and when, do i know when its best to use Vulkan or Directx on linux?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 94 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

I'll go against what most comments said and recommend DirectX 11. Yes, DXVK will translate it to Vulkan anyway, but Larian's own Vulkan implementation is definitely less stable compared to DX11.

I've experienced multiple crashes during simple things like opening the character sheets using the tab key, or crafting alchemy potions. I never had a single crash using DX11. I used Fedora 39/40 and openSUSE Tumbleweed, so the kernels were fairly recent. Radeon 7800 XT GPU.

I had the same experience under Windows 10 (before I switched to Linux), Vulkan has smoother frametimes but DX11 is more stable.

YMMV, this is just my experience from almost 400 hours played so far.

[–] CarlosCheddar@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

This happened to me when playing Hades a few years ago, choosing DirectX was faster and more stable than Vulkan when using Proton.

load more comments (4 replies)