16
What do you think of this explanation of why not going Open Source? (chimbori.com)
submitted 1 week ago by kratoz29@lemm.ee to c/opensource@programming.dev
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am not following these claims carefully, but I have seen tons of copies of Lawnchair in the Playstore.

Another recent event that comes to my mind is the Simple apps, which AFAIK they always were open source? But that didn't matter until it got sold and then Fossify was the non shit version of it (the positive side of open source).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RonSijm@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago

We have seen time and again, especially on Android, that whenever a moderately-popular app goes open-source, it is immediately picked up by unscrupulous developers. They download the source, add obnoxious ads [...]. tracking code [...]. Finally, they publish it to the Play Store

This is a pretty bad argument, especially when you're specifically talking about Android. Android APKs are extremely easy to just download from closed-source, decompile them, and add new things or overwrite existing things.

The argument makes more sense for things that are harder to decompile and recompile

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No readily-compilable project is still a worthwhile barrier. So I don't think it's a bad argument.

If it's about open-source licenses, it typically allows that kind of repackaging. Which is not the case for closed-source/proprietary.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
16 points (90.0% liked)

Opensource

765 readers
55 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
Vacant@programming.dev