this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
801 points (94.6% liked)

People Twitter

5021 readers
1125 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Why are they putting CNN and other capitalist publications on the left hand side of center?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

No idea. I take it with a grain of salt. I guess we need to remember just how far right most publications are.

  • a bitter Canadian
[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It was actually a rhetorical question, because I already know the answer. The answer is that the political spectrum is always relative. There's no such thing as a middle or a center, there's only left or right relative to some other point. It's like movements in space, space doesn't have a north pole or an objective reference point, so you can only say that a particular solar system is a certain distance from our own or some other arbitrary reference point.

Ground News chooses to have an arbitrary reference point, while telling its users that it's an objective source of understanding bias. This is deceptive. It makes users feel that they're unbiased, while entrenching them in the particular biases of USA politics. This is very bad for society as a whole. Ground News is brain rot.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I feel like this is a bit extreme. I assume it has an American bias which I already know is inherently more right than I'd normally think. I adjust my mental read of their scores appropriately. Most of their users are probably American.

It's arbitrary in the same way the current American status quo is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)