Seeing as it was just patched together from other releases with Russian disinfo laced in between - it should have been removed a long time ago. Look up who submitted it to Wikileaks: Guccifer 2.0... who turned out to be a Russian agent (aka Fancy Bear).

Go look at Guccifer 2.0's Wikipedia page, or the US intelligence senate hearing that confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 election. All this info is put there.

Assange thought it was win favor with Trump and maybe get him a pardon. Went as far as to continue to attribute the "leak" to staffer Seth Rich, even after Rich's death in a botched burgulary.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a comment from someone who has no idea what DKIM is.

Those emails were cryptographically proven to be sent from that email server.

Saying anything else proves you are ignorant of the technology and trying to provide cover for emails that were proven to come from the DNC servers at a mathematical level.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:

Some of the documents "Guccifer 2.0" released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0

I never said anything about the technical details. I said the majority of the content was made up from information already released.

But yeah sure buddy, I'm sure the Senate Intelligence Committee got it wrong /s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senate_Intelligence_Committee_report_on_Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election

Maybe do basic research before you go after someone for something they didn't discuss. That way you won't be left looking like an idiot.

There was Russian interference whether you want to believe it or not. I'll let you go back to your qanon discussion group now.

load more comments (15 replies)