this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
1181 points (99.0% liked)

Memes

44148 readers
2160 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 44 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Youtube is wasting ressources, it's a fight they can't win

[–] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (13 children)

nah, if they embed the ad into the video stream (they were testing this for some users!), the only adblocking option will be to blank out the screen and wait through the ad (or download the video in advance and edit the ad out automatically), both of which would make it a lot more annoying to adblock than currently.

[–] DevilOfDoom@lemmy.one 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

YouTube Revanced already has a blocker for sponsor segments embedded in the video.

[–] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you can skip through sponsor segments, but these are ads from youtube, not from the creator, and youtube will not let you conveniently skip through the ads. if implemented correctly, youtube could ensure that the ad is fully played, which would need downloading and automatic editing to counter.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How would they determine if the ad is played without trusting the client? I guess they could screw with the buffer, but that would really piss of people with poor internet, and most people would prefer an ad-length black screen to whatever attention wrenching dark pattern manipulative brown noise wants to infect your mind today.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, I have been using the powerful technology of "the mute button" and "doing other stuff" since before cable TV existed. We always have alternatives.

[–] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

That is an interesting question. From what I know, youtube has every video in chunks that they serve to the client, and so server side ad injection is just serving some ad chunks before the video. I think you're right with the buffer thing, it seems to me like the only way to make sure the client can't skip it would be to make the buffer shorter, impacting some people (although seems like only really people with internet thats fast enough for streaming some seconds, but not other seconds, which is an odd catagory)

Ultimately it would be a tradeoff for youtube, but the fact that they put the effort into doing mass testing of the idea at all shows that clearly there are some good incentives, and it may eventually be implemented.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)