7

An interactive and visual illustration showing how either candidate can win the Electoral College.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Also, I personally feel the Electoral College is archaic and was built upon the principal of inequality. It is also the only reason George W. Bush and Donald J. Trump even got elected in the first place; neither had the popular vote.

I could write an entire essay on how the US and the world would be better off without the Electoral College, but I would just be preaching to the choir and probably nobody would bother reading it (lol.)

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

The Electoral College failed its purpose in 2016

[-] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes. Though, I would argue it failed five times so far:

  1. 1824 (President John Quincy Adams)
  2. 1876 (President Rutherford B. Hayes)
  3. 1888 (President Benjamin Harrison)
  4. 2000 (President George W. Bush)
  5. 2016 (President Donald J. Trump)

Edit: Today, I cannot spell.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

“today” is spelled correctly

[-] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol fair enough. Corrected.

[-] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

With the US 2024 Presidential Election between sitting President Joseph R Biden and former President Donald J Trump coming up on November 5th, I figured I would feature this interactive map, which uses 538’s data. It provides a visual way to illustrate how either candidate can win the Electoral College.

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
7 points (68.4% liked)

Neoliberal

227 readers
18 users here now

Woke Rainbow Capitalism (nerds)

Trains, free trade, and open borders; trans rights and taco trucks on every corner. Please read the sidebar for more information.


Community Bookmarks


Rules:

1. Instance Terms of ServiceComply with the Lemmy.world terms of service.
 
2. CivilityRefrain from name-calling, slapfights, hostility, doxxing, or any uncivil behavior that derails the quality of the conversation.   A specific one of importance you might not generally expect on Lemmy or the wider fediverse, and enforced to further community health, is Do not engage in excessive partisanship.
 
3. BigotryBigotry of any kind will be sanctioned harshly.
 
4. Unconstructive EngagementDo not post with the intent to provoke, mischaracterize, or troll other users rather than meaningfully contributing to the conversation. Don't disrupt serious discussions. Bad opinions are not automatically unconstructive.

Do not reflexively downvote just because someone has a different opinion.

Also, as a general disclaimer, keep in mind that votes on posts and comments are discoverable as they federate with other instances and that is outside the control of this community.

 
5. Off-topic CommentsComments on submissions should substantively address the topic of submission.
 
6. Glorifying ViolenceDo not advocate or encourage violence either seriously or jokingly. Do not glorify oppressive/autocratic regimes.
 
7. BrigadingRefrain from brigading other communities or fediverse instances, or coming from another community or fediverse instance and brigading this community. Links within the community are encouraged provided no other rules are broken.
 
8. Off-topic, Meta, or Duplicate postSubmissions should be relevant to public policy or political theory. Meta posts should be posted to the discussion thread. Generally avoid editorializing submission titles.
 
9. Submission QualityLow-quality or irrelevant submissions will be removed at mod discretion. This applies in particular to low-quality or repetitive memes.
 
10. Tag Communities and/or Users WiselyDo not tag communities and/or users to troll, spam, or brigade.
 
11. Bonk-Posting/Sexual ContentGo be horny somewhere else. Do not post inappropriate content of a sexual nature. Both SFW and NSFW content can qualify. Repeat infringements can lead to bans.
 
12. Toxic Nationalism/RegionalismRefrain from condemning countries and regions or their inhabitants at-large in response to political developments, mocking people for their nationality or region, or advocating for colonialism or imperialism.


Other Fediverse Communities:


We in c/Neoliberal support:

Neoliberals can be found in many political parties and we are not dogmatic supporters of specific parties. But we tend to find ourselves agreeing more often with parties that espouse liberal values, internationalism and centrist economics, such as the Democrats in the US, Liberal Democrats in the UK, FDP in Germany, Renaissance/MoDem in France, the Liberal Party in Canada, and so on.


Further Reading:


News sources:

Here are some suggested news sources that we like and tend to find reliable. Please note that posts and threads are not at all limited to these sources!--

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS