1

By promising a blue ribbon to the friendliest salespeople, the 8-Uhr-Abendblatt even pursued the rather optimistic goal of turning Berlin into a “metropolis of politeness” whose consumer society would be attentive to the needs and desires of individuals. […] With regard to the much debated question of modernity, Nazism drew on the twentieth-century trend toward a culture of generalized consumption and privacy while promising to overcome the impersonal features of formal organizations, industrialized warfare, and market economy. The focus on individuality thus leads us to characterize Nazism as an extreme variant of a broader quest for a different, more socially open, authentic, and personal modernity.

But to answer the essay’s leading question,

Was Nazism Collectivistic?

Short answer: no more than anticommunism in general.

Long answer: see here.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Capitalism in Decay

1093 readers
6 users here now

Fascism is capitalism in decay. As with anticommunism in general, the ruling class has oversimplified this phenomenon to the point of absurdity and teaches but a small fraction of its history. This is the spot for getting a serious understanding of it (from a more proletarian perspective) and collecting the facts that contemporary anticommunists are unlikely to discuss.

Posts should be relevant to either fascism or neofascism, otherwise they belong in !latestagecapitalism@lemmygrad.ml. If you are unsure if the subject matter is related to either, share it there instead. Off‐topic posts shall be removed.

No capitalist apologia or other anticommunism. No bigotry, including racism, misogyny, ableism, heterosexism, or xenophobia. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome.

For our purposes, we consider early Shōwa Japan to be capitalism in decay.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS