The only reason I can think of that EPA would act like this is regulatory capture.
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
99 points (99.0% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2323 readers
234 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What. The. Fuck!
On one hand PFAS are getting removed from industrial, consumer, and firefighting uses because it escapes into the environment and our water supply. On the other hand, the EPA asks the question “what if we sprayed it directly on the environment and our food?”