this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
694 points (97.5% liked)

People Twitter

5226 readers
2126 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] archiduc@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In case you missed the markings on it, it’s also free and runs on electricity, which in France is low carbon.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of the length cutting was just from being able to remove the ICE and all its associated components.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago

Not a lot, the engine is under the passengers in pretty much every modern bus.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And it's a shuttle, not a line bus, tbf

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the distinction is pointless. It's a bus. It is. It simply is a bus. Some kind of bus.

Bus.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shuttles tend to be free of charge more often than buses, for various reasons. This shuttle being gratis does not imply that any other buses in the area are free.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why should the name of the vehicle type depend on whether some governments have a tendency to make them free? It's still a bus. A small bus. A shuttle and a bus. Perchance a shuttle bus. Or just either. But definitely both.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dude, it's not a matter of vehicle type, even trains can be shuttles. It just means that its purpose is to bring people from one point to another without stops, usually from some transportation hub. It's a shuttle because IT'S WRITTEN ON ITS SIDE.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

And it's a bus.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The opposite is true for the US. Because of the abhorrently large firetrucks you can't have smaller roads.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll bet semi trailers contribute as well, it is rarely a single thing.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Also because everything in the US is spread out except for urban areas, mass transit just won't work well for a large part of the population. Didn't help that what transit infrastructure existed came under assault by the oil/car companies of the time, so many places went full automobile.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Half of the US is a stripmall 20km away from a suburb on one end and corn on the other with a parking lot in the middle

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i don’t think that’s really true… australia is hugely spread out and we have pretty great mass transit

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe you had a different history of development then, unlike what I mentioned in the second part. Lots of our 19th-20th century urban areas had trolleys and such, which "mysterious" disappeared when the car came along. Even now in the past decades the public has overwhelming wanted development of things like high speed rail, and yet somehow even mandates voted for on ballots are refused for "reasons".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daltotron@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

The abhorrently large firetrucks which increase the response times before they can get out to fires, because things are more spread out. The abhorrently large firetrucks which siphon away more and more funding, compared to smaller firetrucks, and require more manpower to operate, meaning each fire station individually eats up more funding per unit, meaning we can have less fire stations, further decreasing response times.

An increase in response times which increases the size of fires, requiring more and more abhorrently large firetrucks. The abhorrently large firetrucks which cannot respond quickly enough to wildfires and so will allow them to grow more rapidly out of control, perpetuating more wildfire based ecology, more plants which require fire to grow and will encourage further fire. The abhorrently large firetrucks which are not as cute as small firetrucks.

Those firetrucks? Those are the ones we have to build bigger roads for? some people do legitimately believe this shit, too, hoo lee, kill me

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

interesting thing about fire trucks… i asked a fire fighter friend from the US if he knew why their trucks were different to everywhere else in the world, and apparently it’s because US infrastructure is built for military use… if elsewhere in the world had the heavy duty roads, we might also have the heavier fire trucks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thelsim@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago

That’s a super cute little bus.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No medieval city claims that. Hell, they are more walkable and transit oriented than more modern cities that were designed for cars. Stop with the straw men.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No medieval city claims that.

Its a common enough argument in the UK. I've even seen a few instances in which bus stops have been taken down because people were complaining about the traffic they created (small street with no passing lane, so when the bus stops, the dozen cars behind it are bottled up).

None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

I feel like I perhaps know who may be driving those cars

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Saying they don’t like the location of a bus stop is not saying you can’t have busses.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

It's also not true. Don't know any towns in the UK that don't have buses and use small streets as an excuse.

Most of the towns in the UK that don't have buses use lack of funding from central government as an excuse, which is a pretty good excuse.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

What are you talking about, even York has buses.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago

It's not the medieval cities that fight tooth and nail to prevent public transit.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here in my town, they simply have a refurbished van with like 12 seats hauling people around.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I've seen those. In the suburbs here they often have call-ahead pickup to specific locations, like the only remaining mall or the library.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

If you don't have room for busses now, when will you have room for all the parking required for everyone to drive a car around all the time?

[–] Imhotep@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bluebus 22: 5,460 m (17.9 ft)

Dodge Ram: 6,340 m (20.8 ft)

[–] Allero 4 points 1 month ago

"Hold my mustard" made me smile :D

[–] logi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Aix-en-Provence: Hold my rosé

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

They have the same problem in Siena, Italy.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How many people can sit in that little thing?

[–] glaber@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

My hometown has very similar ones and they can hold up to 25 people adding up seating and standing space, don't underestimate them

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They don't need to sit that many. It's not an interstate route that runs thrice a day and carries 300 people in each run. For it to be an alternative to cars you need to have lots of route and they need to be quite frequent - which means less people in each minibus.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Fuck cars ... but not this car."

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Public transportation is cool, giant SUVs are not.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Cute little bus just gonna keep transporting

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Damn, if only we had more than two options.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

I feel like the top statement is a -

Said no-one ever

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

chokes en Francais

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What is this? A bus for ants?

load more comments
view more: next ›