this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
61 points (94.2% liked)

Academia

901 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I'm so tired of this word.

[–] netwren@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So people and organizations can't realize that they're wrong and change their opinions?

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Did UPenn apologize as part of their celebration? Because the first step to correcting a wrong is to apologize. If they didn't then they didn't actually come to the conclusion they were wrong and change, they simply took advantage of free publicity.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you read the article? It pretty clearly lays out why they are getting the much deserved criticism. The self promotion using their name is why, not the congratulations.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Also, even though things didn't end on a positive note, the Nobel prize winning research was performed largely at Penn, in their lab and on their payroll.

They might have treated her badly, but they still deserve credit.