Why do companies who develope AI models always say such bullshit. In the end it gets released anyway
Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
they say that because they're not ready yet. Once it's ready, you bet they'll try and release and monetize it somehow.
"You can be unethical and still be legal; that's the way I live my life." - Mark Zuckerberg, March 5, 2004.
So knowing that, what is the danger? I‘d think of what it does to making news even more untrustworthy or be used for scamming people, but that can‘t be it, because that is simply unethical and he doesn‘t care about that.
How would the release of it hurt their bottom line? Maybe I am already putting too much thought into this and it‘s just stupid hype building.
I have one too, but it’s too dangerous
it lives in canada. you wouldn't know it.
basically "we create a new ai with no concern with morality and it became as soulless as or company, and we don't want to be sued for creating something that make 4chan look like a uplifting place to hang out with friends and family"
This is what I like to call "building hype," or at least an attempt at it.