this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
107 points (98.2% liked)

goodLongRead

157 readers
12 users here now

Stories that develop over years.

Or long well written articles, that could be on s/technology or s/news, but will probably get deleted there for some obscur rules

Most pay-walled website can be read by simply using the Yesscript add-on (https://github.com/log69/yesscript2), and preventing JavaScript.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago

Not saying whether the conclusion is right or wrong here, but this isn't a "study" in the sense of something published in a rigorously peer-reviewed research journal. It's a random car-ranking company scraping data from the Federal Highway Administration and posting it on their own website. The source is pretty low quality.

Again, just because it's low quality, doesn't mean it's wrong, but I'm not regarding this as very authoritative evidence.

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As someone typing this while driving a Tesla on autopilot I understand

[–] Rivalarrival 5 points 6 days ago

Why did you feel you needed a mobile crematorium?

[–] xploit@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Well, they had good safety rating IIRC - but no amount of safety measures is going to stop idiots from doing idiotic things with an explosive on wheels.

[–] Rivalarrival 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They might have a good collision rating, but their decision to use electric door handles, (and hiding the manual ones) has killed a bunch of people.

[–] xploit@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Oh yeah I have no doubt that it's poorly designed andfrom what I read/saw even shit build quality. You couldnt pay me to drive a tesla. Just kind of amusing when they were flaunting their safety back in the day

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, but they're probably negating that by autopilot crashing cars straight into medians.