this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
106 points (96.5% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2207 readers
212 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oopsie.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 29 points 18 hours ago

Manufacturer tells customer that car drives itself so driver assumes car can drive itself. Car cannot in fact drive itself.

That and the hidden door handles and exotic nature of the fires, and likelyhood of a fire in a high speed impact.

Yeah. This makes sense.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 14 hours ago

Can anyone think of another product where the marketing is so wildly irresponsible that it counteracts the product’s added safety features?

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Eh, annoying article title. The article tells that Tesla drivers are idiots, not that the cars are unsafe what is implied in the title

The study's authors make clear that the results do not indicate Tesla vehicles are inherently unsafe or have design flaws. In fact, Tesla vehicles are loaded with safety technology; the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) named the 2024 Model Y as a Top Safety Pick+ award winner, for example. Many of the other cars that ranked highly on the list have also been given high ratings for safety by the likes of IIHS and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, as well.

So, why are Teslas — and many other ostensibly safe cars on the list — involved in so many fatal crashes? “The models on this list likely reflect a combination of driver behavior and driving conditions, leading to increased crashes and fatalities,” iSeeCars executive analyst Karl Brauer said in the report. “A focused, alert driver, traveling at a legal or prudent speed, without being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, is the most likely to arrive safely regardless of the vehicle they’re driving.”

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The design of the car heavily influences driver behavior, so you can't hand-wave away with "Tesla drivers are idiots". A major issue is that the FSD, sensors, cameras, etc. all give a false sense of security, leading to drivers engaging in more risky behavior. The term for this is Risk Compensation.

There aren't sensors anymore, just cameras so it's actually worse than it was a decade ago

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, calling it "full self drive" probably contributes more than a little. Or the "always speed 10%" option.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

I'd assume insurance companies would include that in their scoring, they're in for the money from insurance not from car companies paying for safety scores