this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
101 points (98.1% liked)

Ukraine

9347 readers
268 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Ukraine is right to worry about the end of US aid. TFG is definitely not on their side.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So a suicide drone with a small jet engine?

Impressive it is cheaper at 10k than the Shaheds which allegedly go for 15-30k and use a moped engine. But I am not sure if this counts as a missile which normally use solid fuel.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its a drone with a pulse jet and a small warhead. It's basically a modern V1 production run. Being how pulse jets work I wouldn't be that suprised to learn two cycle engines are more expensive.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Oh cool I only knew of turbofans. TIL.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Is this headline really trying to imply that Ukraine developed an entire missle in the last 2 months? If that were the case, they'd never have needed foreign aid in the first place.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago

They have been working on lots of things since the war started. Given the restrictions on using western missiles I'm sure these were on the important list since the start of the war (and it wouldn't surprise me if they were in development as a 15 year project before). Small drones are fast and easy to make so they went all in on them early, but other things also got development. 2 years to deliver a missile sounds about right to me - they are much more complex than a small drone.

[–] Marduk73@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

True. Downvoters clearly aren't engineers. I hope Ukraine will get all the support they require though.

[–] Docus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where did you get β€˜2 months’ from?

The Trembita, under development since 2023,

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

The election.

I was pointing out the sensationalist headline. The contents of the article are irrelevant. Obviously they've been developing this for longer than 2 months.

[–] Axiochus@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair point, Trump has only started existing two months ago.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Yes, and the USA is the only country providing aid to Ukraine πŸ™„

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

@Vent designing the missile is one thing. Getting a production facility up and running and protecting it from Russian bombardments while ensuring constant supply is a whole different thing.

Edit: and it's been under development since 2023. It doesn't look like it's been developed overnight somewhere in the last two months or so.
@Sunshine

[–] Burstar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

The og version isn't much better.

Ukraine’s Moscow-malleting doodlebug missile is about to become very important

That said 'completes development' instead of 'develops' would have been an, unlikely in this inexplicable era of minimum syllable headlines, improvement.