FediLore + Fedidrama

2445 readers

4 users here now

Rules

Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

sexy_peach@feddit.org

-12

Do you remember a few days ago when I asked if we could talk about things that happen outside the fediverse? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by CraigOhMyEggo@lemmy.ml to c/fediverselore@lemmy.ca

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A few days ago, I asked if we could talk about things that happen outside the fediverse. I got a lot of different answers ranging from "yes" to "no" to "it depends". Hunting someone down somewhere and saying "ah ha I found Zezima on X" isn't the kind of thing I meant. This is.

That moment when an admin outright makes it absolutely clear if you read the room (those who remember past messages will be able to do that) that they're going around trying to get back at people and further complicate things for them, the instance in question being in spiteful response to a promotion. The incentive to weigh in is thus pre-existing, plus I am fediversally relevant because I have been accused of being them (not that I'm the only one), so I get the contagion.

It's a bit much.

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uhhhh, what?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing of all of this makes sense to me. It's just s rambling mess of words.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's not kidding when he says the context to understand the whole thing is in what he redirects to.

For example, the second and third sentence is a direct response to the replies which talk about the conditions for which the actions he is asking about would be considered "good". Take the top response for example: "I think you might be the drama at that point."

In the fifth sentence, he alludes to the understanding that the person who made a "first move" (which would be relevant in the discussions just mentioned) is the individual in question, before citing the first few moments of the context (before continuing to elaborate the first part of the fifth sentence). The "promotion" mentioned is an admin promotion. "The incentive to weigh in is thus pre-existing" refers to this, and then he mentions why it applies to him.

I have English issues and even I could comprehend all of this.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just watched the Youtube video, I'm even more confused. Is that channel accusing you of being a pedophile? What the heck?

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what going on. I've always been someone people are inclined to make into a target.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That seems messed up on so many levels. Have you tried reaching out to Youtube to remove those videos?

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Having seen that kind of thing attempted, there is every sign at this point the people in charge there won't allow any changes/intervention.