Why is minimum specs the only one to have a specific intel cpu and ryzen equivalent when every other category is ryzen cpu or Intel equivalent? Is it some convoluted way to throw shade at Intel or something
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
6 points (66.7% liked)
Games
16665 readers
797 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I think it's just that the 7600K was incredibly popular, and for good reason: it's still relevant after 6 years.
Putting the 3700x (a 4yo chip) in "recommended" essentially communicates that it scales with more cores, but that any recent mid-range CPU is probably good enough (my 5600X generally beats the 3700X).
DLSS at performance for recommended 1080@60 on a RTX 3070.... Aw Where is the line between laziness and progress? I remember playing god of war on a R9 390 and the game looked awesome while still managing to run at 1080@60.
It feels like a most of the Devs switched from "looking and playing good on midtier hardware" to "playable on toptier and I don't care about the rest"