this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Science

13007 readers
61 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It feels like we're approaching a situation where good clean astronomical data is going to have to be collected off-world.

Like, people in astronomy must be talking about such a scenario and how far away it is and what needs to be done.

A moon base seems like an obvious solution with dishes and telescopes all over the place.

[–] iraq_lobster@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

well polluting earth orbit with parasite radio frequencies is in SpaceX business model favor: that way the scientific communtiy well be obliged to have observatories beyond starlink orbit (ie Leo i think), so u would have to create ur cluster of radio astronomy satellites and would have to contract SpaceX to deliver them for you to the intended orbit..just a guess but one would think this way, since every company is profit driven after all.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Capitalism sure is efficient at exploiting externalities. SpaceX gets to ignore the difficulty and cost of stopping radiation pollution. The cost gets externalised to research institutions, academic researchers, government agencies (and so indirectly the taxpayer), and other corporations. Whereas it might cost $X for SpaceX to not cause the problem in the first place, it might cost $10X or $50X or more when everyone else has to duplicate cost and effort to overcome SpaceX's pollution.