this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59466 readers
3287 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
86
Court: Cloudflare is Liable for Pirate Site, But Not as a DNS Provider (torrentfreak.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silverbax@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 30 points 11 months ago

That's actually a reasonable verdict.

While DNS is a basic need, CDN is a luxury.

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Does the verdict mention anything about the DNS service itself (buying a website through cloudflare and setting up records)? Or is it just concerning the public DNS resolver (1.1.1.1?)

[–] marius851000@lemmy.mariusdavid.fr 10 points 11 months ago

This article clearly is just about the public DNS resolver. Using cloudflare to register a domain is well different, in particular cause it’ll play a “significant” role to make it accessible. (as 1. it is not neutral (you need to be a customer) and 2. Removing a registration will block it for everyone).