this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
102 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

59422 readers
3739 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Naomi Brockwell makes it easy and interesting to learn about how our personal lives are being spied on by potentially anybody. Share it with your friends and family so maybe one day every country won't have a social credit score or other dystopian outcomes.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This thumbnail does not inspire confidence in the quality of the content. It is a pure clickbait title screen.

Can anyone vouch for the quality of this video, other than the poster?

[–] nous@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This thumbnail does not inspire confidence in the quality of the content. It is a pure clickbait title screen.

So is just about every video created over the last few years. This is the new norm and can no longer be used to judge a bit of content. For ~~better or~~ worst.

The video itself is a good overview of what data brokers are and what they collect on you with some ways to help mitigate this. Honestly not very big news for anyone that is already into data privacy, but it will be very eye opening for anyone that is not already aware of what they collect.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

So is just about every video created over the last few years. This is the new norm and can no longer be used to judge a bit of content. For better or worst.

Completely agreed, and is why I asked. The vast majority of youtube videos with these clickbait title screens (let's be honest, it's basically all of them) tend to not be worth watching, to me.

I appreciate your response, specifically, "Honestly not very big news for anyone that is already into data privacy". I'm deep into data privacy as I deal with it every day in my line of work, so I was curious if this was a deep dive or high level "for noobs".

Hopefully others see value in this video! But it sounds like it isn't for me.

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember hearing someone talk about how you have to have those shitty kinds of thumbnails to get any decent visibility on YouTube. I’m not sure exactly how it works or if there’s any truth to it though.

[–] nous@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I have heard multiple different creators say a similar thing - they don't want to but it works and not doing it hurts the views they get. And there are lots of creators out there basically doing A/B testing on them to see what things preform better - and this is what we are left with.

It is sad that meaningful titles at least have gone as it makes it much harder to actually search for things. Thumbnails I care less about.

I’m not sure exactly how it works

Sadly I think it works because people click on them. Or are more likely to. Most people seem to just be more likely to click on the flashy simple click baity titles and thumbnails. Those that don't, I suspect, are in the small minority. Though I think at least some of this is due to them pushing algorithmic content over anything else so hard.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I'm sure it's good and she seems legit, but I fucking hate videos. A blog post I could scan and read so much faster, as well as judge its legitimacy in seconds instead of having to invest minutes of my life.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Check out her website, she's a friend of Michael Bazzell, or let her video speak for itself and just watch it

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a friend of Michael Robertson, is that relevant?

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, neither is Michael Bazzell then

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except for that Michael Bazzell is the gold standard for living a private and secure life and he values her opinion and insights enough that he had her speak on his podcast. Michael Robertson has nothing to do with this topic.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Thought I might be missing something so I looked up his Wikipedia page

Tumbleweed

[–] Echo71Niner@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Most browser advertisement blocking extensions been blocking most of what the vid talks about.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

So you won't believe that someone who is a credible person might use flashy clickbaity imagery unless random bozos on the internet tell you she's credible?

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=GQHutNQVLgw

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago
[–] lemann@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

Very well put together video about how data brokers exploit our data and are used by governments, private investigators and officers to skirt around legal processes.

The video also briefly discusses an individual who searched one broker's database for themselves in 2014, and it practically pulled up data about their entire life and history, despite them not being terminally online... would rather not imagine what things are like now

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You can't be 100% anonymous and free of prying eyes -- but you can (definitely) lessen its effect.

[–] Echo71Niner@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I personally think, with Bill Gate push for Digital ID, for every single person on the internet will eventually must have a social credit score, I have no doubt this is coming.

As for this vid you shared, I want to remind people of the following browser extensions that will block majority of them, and I personally use. You can get them for firefox or chrome.

Decentraleyes

Unpaywall

Adblock

Disconnect

uBlock Origin

Adblocker Ultimate

[–] motorheadkusanagi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sic semper tyrannis? you're seriously referencing john wilkes booth with your username?!

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Many people drive drunk and injure people but people don't stop driving because of one way the vehicle can be used for bad. Sure, JWB is associated with the phrase but the Latin phrase can also stand on it's own merits too. I'm not a supporter of JWB in any way.

[–] yip-bonk@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay but it’s the first thing people will think. So, you’ll likely always be defending it. Just 2¢.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago

I figured as much when I created the handle.