this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8205 readers
765 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 29.08.23 were approximately:

  • personnel - about 261840 (+530) people / persons,
  • tanks - 4414 (+14) units,
  • armored personnel carriers - 8579 (+17) units
  • artillery systems - 5450 (+25) units,
  • MLRS - 733 (+3) units,
  • air defense systems / Anti-aircraft warfare systems - 500 (+1) units
  • aircraft - 315 (+0) units
  • helicopters - 316 (+0) units,
  • UAV operational-tactical level - 4387 (+4),
  • cruise missiles - 1419 (+4),
  • ships / boats / warships / boats - 18 (+0) units,
  • vehicles and fuel tanks - 7909 (+43) units
  • special equipment - 820 (+11).

Data are being updated.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

arty party is accelerating, it's not 40+ arty pieces a day, but it's more than it has been recently

[–] Redditgee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wonder, including how many people have left Russia, what percentage of the population is down. In deaths, that level of loss is greater than anything we've seen since maybe Iran/Iraq war, though not on par with the Second Congo War. If we assume Ukrainian losses are similar to what the Russians have, we're close to Vietnam and Korea numbers. In a more industrialized country, that has to be getting felt, especially as the pool for soldiers is the same pool that the worker base is pulled from.

While equipment losses are likely more important to the goal of victory, casualties are a piece of the puzzle, and have longer term implications. With sanctions finally starting to bite, I'm curious to know what Russia does for the next decade, or so. Where China might usually fill the gaps, they can't afford to help, with their own economy in peril. I think, at the very least, we'll see Russia pull away from their dealings in Africa and the middle east, which is huge, because until Ukraine, Russian diplomacy seemed to be quite successful in those areas. The US appeared to be having trouble countering it, routinely. Lavrov looked like some kind of genius, until the full scale invasion of Ukraine. It's still mind blowing that they've pursued this war, as soon as they realized Kyiv didn't fall, and the Ukrainians weren't rolling over. While taking a hit to their prestige, they could've walked away intact. Now, that no longer seems to be on the table.

[–] GeKVe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

500 👏👏👏