this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
48 points (85.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35807 readers
1500 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Delta15N@lemmy.ca 63 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because it’s a bandaid on an arterial bleed of a problem and has its own host of issues (anoxia once the algae blooms die off being one of the big ones, aside from the cost of actually doing it on a global scale). Lots of discussion around whether it makes sense to do, but really for the effort to do it, and the unintended effects on the environment, it would probably be better and cheaper to just reduce GHG emissions.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 8 months ago

Any fix on symptoms will only give the worst offenders more excuses to increase emissions. See carbon capture and carbon credits. It's already being used as an excuse to not do anything real about the problem.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because band aide solutions are just bullshit distractions. We need less emissions and we need it yesterday.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think we're past just lowering emissions. We need to find ways pull some of the co2 out of the atmosphere.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 months ago

Cool - but lowering emissions is far more effective than any of these solutions. Let's get serious about that before discussing remediation.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Check out GeoGirl on YouTube, she has an excellent video about this. https://youtu.be/IYOTFuklRvI

She also has a lot of other videos where she describes different geological processes and their interconnectedness.

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 2 points 8 months ago

invidious / piped for those who don’t want to watch on YouTube.

[–] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

CO2 emissions are not the only problem with burning things for power. Air polution causes an estimated 3.6 million deaths annualy (thats like world war 2 every 20 years), with the bulk of those (2.1 million) being caused just by ultrafine soot and ozone from burning fues. Additionaly, burning coal produces huge amount of ashes that are full of toxic heavy metals, in quanties that are near impossible to safely dispose of. Most of this ash just gets pilled up, where it it gets blown into the enviroment. (Fun fact, these ash piles are radioactive from naturaly occuring uranium and thorium)

The only way out is to stop burning things as fuel.

[–] WastedJobe@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago

It could change the pH of the oceans, making it harder for anything to live there. Plus, it might not store the CO2 for longer than 1000 years, which doesnt really solve the issue (I have a source for that somewhere, I think it was the IPCC).