this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] demonquark@lemmy.ml 29 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I’ve never understood these half legalization laws. “Legal” consumption, illegal production. The same thing with prostitution laws were it’s legal to sell sex, but illegal to buy it.

Whatever.

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

With prostitution, it makes sense (if you want to criminalize it at all).
You don't want to criminalize people who are often pressured into prostitution, because that would cut them off from getting help or going to the police if they are abused.

With weed, what the Dutch model tries to achieve is to not punish people for smoking weed, but also not turn it into a for-profit industry that would create an incentive to get more people addicted.
I think the German model is better in this regard: Let supply also be legal, but non-commercial. But they went overboard with the regulations (police can get a list of all consumers at any time, without a court order or criminal suspicion). And it looks like the decriminalization will fail at the last minute anyway.

[–] baru@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

With weed, what the Dutch model tries to achieve is to not punish people for smoking weed, but also not turn it into a for-profit industry that would create an incentive to get more people addicted.

It's more that there's a lot of conservative parties that do not agree on the drug policy. E.g. enough Christian parties who would rather be more restrictive.

[–] taladar@feddit.de 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alcohol producers are probably lobbying against it too.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the reason that legalization in Belgium isn't even remotely on the table. AB Inbev practically writes the law here.

[–] TwoCubed@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

I regularly have to work with them. They are worse than Hitler. Fuck ABI.

[–] tromars@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

AFAIK the Dutch model so far (consumption and sale somewhat allowed, but no growing or importing) has created huge criminal organisations that also started to do a lot of other crimes (bc what’s there to lose if you’re going to jail anyway basically) and a big goal in designing the new German law was to not mess it up like the Netherlands have

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Dutch authorities started cracking down on small-time growers, which opened the (black) market up to large criminal organizations.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of it has to do with the way Cannabis is treated at the EU-level. Some countries are trying to legalize it in a way that doesn't conflict with existing regulations. That is also why it took Germany so long to approve their new legalization bill.

[–] TwoCubed@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

Conservative fuckfaces are trying to torpedo it. I fucking hate those people. Everything has turned to shit in the last couple of years. At least give me some weed .

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

Its so the people who dont have any other choice, are addicted or forced to prostitute themselves arent punished. The people abusing all these things can be punished.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's to avoid criminalising the victims. A prostitute is in a bad financial situation. A customer exploits that: "don't want to starve? Suck this dick bitch!"

[–] EarMaster@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

It also shifts the power dynamic. If prostitution would be illegal the customer could use this to (further) exploit the person prostituting beyond the financial pressure.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's called compromise - kind of base of this whole democraticy thing we have going.

[–] StitchIsABitch@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh what a great 'compromise', "you can take a bite of this cake but if you swallow I will punch you in the face". This has nothing to do with democracy, democracy means you do what the majority of people want, not a half-assed, kinda-doing-it-but-also-kinda-not thing.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Konservatives want all drugs illegal and progressives want a more sensible approach - to keep peace in society democracy is able to find a compromise between those groups. After some time when acceptance rises, the compromise can be negotiated.