this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
175 points (95.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6486 readers
862 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, terrorist travelled west therefore West is involved.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

On a related note: there are rockets fired daily to Kyiv from the direction of Japan

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 months ago

Source of the Non-Credible Take, I just help provide missing evidence, that's all :)

[–] S_204@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

Russia is blaming Israel aren't they? Saw a news report saying they were attacking Tel Aviv.... cuz y'know, Ukraine and Israel -same same.

The more Russia says right now, the more it looks like they did this themselves. They've got a history of doing it.

[–] feine_seife@feddit.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, there is no definitve proof of it.

The terrorist told that they worked with someone, who provided them guns and promised a life in luxury. And Ukraine has been constantly working with random groups inside Russia, so it is a possibility, but so is ISIS.

( I question if ISIS would promise a life in luxury, but so do I question the terrorists reliability.)

Also the terrorists appear to be somewhat combat trained if you inspect the footage closer wich supports the ISIS claim.

Probability the truth is somewhere in the middle and both where somewhat involved.

(I suspect SBU wanted someone to burn the theater down and hired people that wanted a bit more than just arson. But Idk.)

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The terrorist told that they worked with someone, who provided them guns and promised a life in luxury

Some dude who the FSB says is a terrorist said something. For all we know he was some poor random fuck they picked up off the street and beat for 6h until he agreed to say something on camera. You absolutely can't take evidence produced by the FSB at face value