this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
115 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2242 readers
24 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An update to this post https://beehaw.org/post/6717143

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 48 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Newbern is about 80% Black and 20% white

Many residents did not know they were allowed to have elections.

[checks year] ...WTF?

[–] ConstableJelly@midwest.social 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Braxton assumed office by default in 2020 when he filed for office and no one else, including the incumbent, did the same.

The defendants, listed as former mayor Haywood “Woody” Stokes III and his town council, held a secret, special election, preventing Braxton from appointing his town council. During their special election, the previous town council re-elected themselves, and ultimately reappointed the previous town mayor.

[Rechecks the year] ...WTF??

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago

Double secret special election: SEE, IT'S ALL ABOVE BOARD AND LEGAL-LIKE...don't get uppity 'bout it, now.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago

Hm... I think I'm more shocked by people not realizing they have a right to vote. Secret cabals, nepotism, corruption, etc. in politics are more like "water is wet", or "creek water may be full of dung".

[–] Tiltinyall@beehaw.org 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It sucks to slog through voter suppression efforts every day online and then find an entire town being suppressed. THIS... THIS...THIS.. POST is the cumulative result of the efforts of ANYONE who tells SOMEONE else to withhold their vote for a political stance. You ARE a vote suppressionist! 👈👈👈

[–] core@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've been told my vote won't matter if I don't vote for the right candidate. that's voter suppression if I've ever seen it

[–] ConstableJelly@midwest.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The common thread with any definition of voter suppression is that it reduces voting. Being encouraged to vote and in such a way as to increase its power is as close to the opposite of voter suppression as you can get.

Call it something else if you like, but it ain't voter suppression.

[–] core@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

if i'm told my vote won't count, why would i vote?

[–] ConstableJelly@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Where have you been for the past 3 months lol.

why would i vote?

The power of your vote isn't affected by someone...commenting on it...so you'd still vote for whatever reason you had before you were told that. Being told that your vote would be wasted on, presumably, a third-party candidate is just practical commentary. If you find yourself dissuaded by that, you're not being suppressed, you're just...childishly impressionable. Please forgive the insult.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tiltinyall@beehaw.org 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

If you are online supporting the idea of withholding ones vote in order to advance a political agenda, you are enacting voter suppression. Layed out pretty simply for you.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Art thou talking about us, or is that a "generic you" like a "royal we"?

(because if thou are talking about me in particular, we hold no wish to keep up with thine baseless misplaced accusations)

[–] Tiltinyall@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't get it, you trolling?

[–] Phroon@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You replied to jarfil with the words "this post", it isn't clear if "this post" refers to jarfil's comment or to the article itself. Also, the use of "You" leads the reader to imply that the "You" is jarfil, rather than "You" meaning 'anyone who tells someone to withhold their vote for a political stance'.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

jarful

Please, no... 🤦

(rant)

I've kept this nick since back in the 1990s, when I had to spell it over the phone while creating an account, because client support said "Oh, like Garfield?" and I found it funny... since I also liked cats, the comic strip, hated Mondays, and loved lasagna... a couple decades later Google decided that "Did you mean: jar file", and since becoming a brony, the full jar thing has become a very unfortunate coincidence. But I refuse to change it, I was there first!...

[–] Phroon@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sincere apologies, I typed it correctly 2/3 times and messed up on number 3. Corrected.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

Np. I'm kind of used/resigned to it... 🙂

[–] Tiltinyall@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I understand now, I wasn't arguing.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, I was being funny... but now I'll be crystal clear:

  • IF you were referring to a generic group, THEN say so and we're fine, but you could have made it more clear.
  • IF you were accusing me of being a vote suppressionist, THEN explain precisely what lead you to that idea, and we can see where the misunderstanding came from.
  • ELSE, I will assume you're not discussing in good faith (trolling as you say) and hit the block button.

No hard feelings. 🕊

[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Withholding votes no, but IMO the American voting system (at least at a national level) seems pretty broken to me. FPTP, the weird bias to rural areas etc.

Really it should be changed so that it doesn't always result in this eternal standoff between the two major parties.

Ireland, Australia and New Zealand dumped FPTP and were better for it. It's just that the US has this kind of romantic idealism about the original founders, as if they were always right and their ideas still hold as much merit in this day and age of voter influencing through digital means, so I don't really see it happening there. But it should, in my opinion.

Right now it seems like every major election is choosing between bad and worse there and voting for an outsider is just a lost vote.

In that sense I can understand the reluctance of voters to actually show up. Especially in states that aren't swing states.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The town is 133 people, I would also be suprised that they would have elections, I wouldnt have thought they even need a government.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If they are an incorporated plece, and they get the whole shebang of taxes, funding, elections, etc., then they need someone to run it, or a "government".

Guess it sometimes could be hard to tell, with all the varying rules, but people who live there... are there places in the "deep US", where people live in anarchy?

(sometimes it might also be the case where an incorporated town, through depopulation, ends up with nobody willing to act as mayor, but that's different)

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like the first vote I would want is to unincorporate, I dont want some small town good ol boys telling me what to do.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I might be wrong, but it seems to me like unincorporated places would depend on county level, or some larger place, good boys telling you what to do. I'm guessing it also comes with a budget, taken out of the residents taxes, for stuff like services, police... elected official's pay... and similar.

At a population of 133, it sounds more like a HOA, but dunno.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

You are right, but I would prefer good ol boys in a different town that tend to not know I exist and let me and my neighbors do our own thing.

[–] ninjaphysics@beehaw.org 17 points 7 months ago

At a time, white supremacy tactics thrived in elected positions, from local to Fed. No longer are we going to allow this to continue.

Keep educating citizens on their rights to hold office, in school boards, state positions, and the presidency, and this kind of shit will finally die like it should have ages ago.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 7 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryThe Legal Defense Fund (LDF), an organization that focuses on racial and civil rights, along with an Alabama-based private law firm, filed a preliminary injunction to force Newbern, a town of about 133 people, to hold elections and allow its citizens to vote for the first time in years.

Previous Newbern mayors had also been appointed or ran unopposed, with several of the officers serving in the position for more than 10 years.

Though the white officials have not recognized his position, Braxton has continued trying to serve as mayor, using his own funds to host events and food distribution drives.

The LDF suit aims to give all citizens in the town an opportunity to vote – something that would be history making.

“For decades, officials in my town have excluded me and other voters from participating in elections and having a say in what happens here,” Braxton said in a statement provided by the LDF.

We ask the courts to enforce elections in Newbern this November so that we can cast our ballots and actively participate in the democratic process.”


Saved 64% of original text.

[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This is not news at all. In fact it was sent every single time until something broke in Apple's validation servers and nobody could launch any app a few years ago. That brought this whole phenomenon to light and Apple changed it to reporting once per week. Edit: Ah I see this is also an old article. That makes sense now.

However they should just send a blacklist to each system obviously. That's a much more privacy-conscious method. Their stated goal is to be able to block malware, but there can't be that many.

[–] Predalien@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you hit the wrong thread lol

[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

Oops yes. Sorry.