this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
93 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59149 readers
2063 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Arstechnica: “AI took my job, literally”—Gizmodo fires Spanish staff amid switch to AI translator::Meanwhile, readers say that some AI-penned articles switch languages halfway through.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LifeInOregon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gizmodo is and has been the worst for a long time. In fact, that entire network of sites has been a rats nest of garbage for years. Unsurprising that they’d go this route.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I’ve dropped them from my newsfeed. If they’re just going to be writing AI summaries of what other sites have already published, and getting the facts wrong as a result, you’re literally better off reading nothing rather than read their articles, and trying to read them just encourages them because they’re still getting ad revenue.

[–] 1bluepixel@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm bilingual and this absolutely baffles me. AI translation is not at the level of a human translator at all. It's inept at deducing context or at handling slang, regionalisms, or ambiguity.

I do translations routinely and I tried AI tools. It's such garbage for anything except basic stuff that I prefer to start from scratch.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It’s good enough to provide pulp for a clickbait headline and sell ads.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Getting AI to do stuff that looks cool is easy. Getting it to do something with high quality without any human in the loop is not.

And companies should honestly just get fucked.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former Gizmodo writer Matías S. Zavia publicly mentioned the layoffs, which took place via video call on August 29, in a social media post.

Earlier this summer, Gizmodo began publishing AI-generated articles in English without informing or involving its editorial staff.

The stories were found to contain multiple factual inaccuracies, leading the Gizmodo union to criticize the practice as unethical.

For Spanish-speaking audiences seeking news about science, technology, and Internet culture, the loss of original reporting from Gizmodo en Español is potentially a major blow.

Subtle errors, mistranslations, and lack of cultural knowledge can impair the quality of automatically translated content.

But with so many media companies chasing revenue through SEO manipulations and AI-written filler, it's unlikely that we'll see the end of this apparently cost-cutting AI trend soon.


The original article contains 523 words, the summary contains 129 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] BadRS@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this irony? I'm never sure

[–] Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Man, can't even block the user without blocking all replies too.