Memes

45172 readers

2017 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml

sexy_peach@feddit.de

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

1132

Bacon (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago by Lisk91@sh.itjust.works to c/memes@lemmy.ml

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you didn't expect a machine that has very hot elements very close to your food to make such food burn if used wrongly, that's on you.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree, but I feel like having the toaster itself catch fire could have been mitigated somehow.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then you get to play the “asbestos flakes or salt?” game. Fun for the whole family!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That said, eating asbestos flakes isn't the most dangerous thing. Plastic partially burning close to your food, but too slowly for you to notice seems way worse... And there are many fire retardants that are safer to handle in a factory but that will give you a really bad time if you eat them.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Fire "removedants?" You mean fire removedants? How about artardents? I suppose one could argue that the automatic censorship of your word is a form of dysfunctional regulation.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Does ML censors parts of words now?