Asklemmy

43942 readers

589 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

114

how do you survive lazy coworkers? (linux.community)

submitted 3 months ago by eli04@linux.community to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

obligatory I'm a German nurse living in Germany, but the German channels on lemmy don't have as many members as this one, so I ask here.

When I work I like to do my job and then relax. To me, doing it the other way round is just stupid. I was never the kind of person that goes to work to socialize, I don't need it and I strongly resent forced socialization.

For the last 2 years I've worked within the same hospital system and it's clear to me now, nobody thinks like me: all my coworkers spend the first hour of the shift talking about their private lives, as they were looking for excuses not to work and expect anyone else to take care of patients. And because I'm the only one with this job mentality, it's always me the one who works while the rest do nothing.

This is very frustrating and I'm now applying elsewhere, but it bothers me that my new workplace can turn out to be like this.

I'm also applying for office positions (no shifts) and wonder: does this happen there as well? Ideally I'd be completely responsible for my work alone.

I feel like a student at school again, when the teacher forced me to work in a group with the lazier ones and I ended up either doing most of the job or became as lazy as them. Why work when they don't?

I don't want to work with people who slow me down.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You are letting yourself be exploited, look for a place that quickly notice your work culture and grand you a better pay / career.

Edit: how do I deal with it? I don't really care what other do, thigs that don't work are always on the higher ups, if my colleagues are having fun on the job, good for them!

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, operating dangerously close to "work to rule" most days is a great way to minimize exploitation.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you were trying to say.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Within any job, there is what your role is on paper, and what you actually do over the course of a work day. Often times what you actually do is much more than "expected". Work to rule means that you stick explicitly to what your role is, and the way the company expects you to perform your duties. Or rather, what they expect on paper.

An example: Unionized employees will often "work to rule" as one of the first steps aimed at putting pressure on an employer to negotiate. It's an entirely legal thing to do, and serves to exemplify the disconnect between on paper job expectations (what you are paid for), and real expectations.

Thus, working as per your contract/job description with minimal deviation, will minimize how much you are exploited by ensuring you only do the work out are paid for.