this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
342 points (91.9% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
910 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poopsmith@lemmy.world
zephyr@lemmy.world
342
Principal Skinner on Immutable Distros (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 month ago by Europa_The_Last_Battle@programming.dev to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/15781466

Am I out of touch?

No, it's the forward-thinking generation of software engineers that want elegant, reliable, declarative systems that are wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But an immutable distro is not necessarily declarative, and the other way around.

Why lump them together?

[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm guessing this refers to the not entirely separate groups of Nix(OS), Haskell, XMonad fans

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Don’t forget us Bluefin/Aurora people either

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

an immutable distro is not necessarily declarative

It is necessarily so. You can't configure an immutable distro by a sequence of mutations.

But yes, the other way around is quite possible.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

You can't configure an immutable distro by a sequence of mutations.

Isn't that literally how ostree works?

[–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

NixOS isn't immutable though. It runs on normal writable ext4 by default.