UK Politics
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
view the rest of the comments
If they do business in the UK, they ca n be fined in the UK. It would also encourage other companies to do the same.
Social media companies have abused the trust placed in them. Now he thinks he's infallible.
But that is the point. Companies do not need to do business in the UK.
Swift payment systems make it so easy now that the payer can never be entirly sure where their money goes.
This is how so many big corps are avoiding taxation legally now.
Given the idiots who are paying for checkmarks, and VAT collection, twitter has a UK subdivision (Twitter UK), which regardless of size of operation gives UK Gov jurisdiction.
If someone is compelled to speak to the Commons, it's very very rare that they refuse because if you do - and your host country is an ally - you'll have your government on your back too.
Yep. But they can and will close it if the parliament annoys them. And already avoid taxes by claiming money is not received in the UK. Just like facebook, amazon, google etc. This is way the ASA has little ability to control online advertising.
As for foreign citizens called to parliament. You clearly forgot what happened last time when Zuckerberg just refused. Our allies are really only so when it benefits them.
The difference with Zuckerberg is that there was a change in government shortly after. The people who benefited from Facebook's cosy relationship became the government, and Trump was president.
My point is that given different people in charge powers which exist can be used, whether they will or not is of course what we'll find out.
Sanctioning Musk as an individual could get very funny very quickly.
It could. But won't. Because as I say. Parliment has zero actual power over him.
You make out Zuckerberg was an odd situation.
But honestly. Name an occasion where the UK parliment has had any power to summon the leaders of a non UK company. Even the US Congress has difficulty unless the company actually wants to be summoned. As we have seen with social media companies sending powerless no bodies to their summons.
This is exactly what musk would do. And no way the US would help enforce it. Par.iment dose not have any extradition treatiesrelated to the right to MPs questions.