this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
154 points (97.0% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4674 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
9Q6u7hroWkwW9@lemmy.ml
154
A Different Way of Measuring Time: Metric Time (metric-time.com)
submitted 2 months ago by original_reader@lemm.ee to c/damnthatsinteresting@lemmy.ml
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What do you think?

You can read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_time

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And 1/3 of 100 is 33.3333333333333. There are strong arguments for a base 12 number system (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duodecimal), and some folks have already put together a base 12 metric system for it. 10 is really quite arbitrary if you think about it. I mean we only use it because humans have 10 fingers, and it's only divisible by 5 and 2.

That said, the best argument for sticking with base 10 metric is that it's well established. And base 10 time would make things more consistent, even if it has some trade offs.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I will always up vote base12 superiority posts

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Ancient central Americans used a base 12 number system and counted on their fingers using finger segments (3 per finger, 4 fingers, 12 segments). Makes fractions way more intuitive